This author argues that the ruling is not merely a clarification of locus standi under Section 9, but a conceptual shift in the function of interim relief.

This piece argues that labelling alone cannot solve the deepfake problem, because synthetic content can be stripped of its provenance well before it reaches the public that needs protecting.

The ability to monetise an arbitral claim depends on the stage of the dispute. The transaction must therefore be built around the asset that actually exists at the relevant stage, after examining the underlying contract for restrictions and documenting the transfer under the TPA and, where relevant, the Code of Civil Procedure 1908.