A mere private settlement cannot deprive the CCI from investigating concerns raised regarding the market structure at large.

The commitment mechanism will also provide entities with the opportunity to avoid incurring heavy penalties.

While Google might currently appear insulated from regulatory action, the landscape for big-tech companies could shift significantly.

Deterrence under the Act is what makes the leniency, commitment and settlement provisions attractive.

The incorporation of antitrust laws into sustainability presents a multidimensional challenge.

It is pertinent for the CCI to be vested with a significant authority to regulate the happenings in the digital market ecosystem.

The decision in INSA v. ONGC, if not overturned, would become a significant setback for competition jurisprudence in India.

The author aims to examine the implications of the lesser penalty regulations on India’s antitrust landscape.

A collaborative approach must be taken by the CCI and the Controller for SEP disputes involving anti-competitive behaviour.

This piece attempts to analyse the effects of CJEU’s judgement on the powers of Bunderskallmt.

The article analyzes the Microsoft-Activision deal from the perspective of new amendments to the Competition Act 2002.

It is evident that the current competition law does not lack provisions for tackling the unique challenges posed by digital markets.

The jurisprudence with regard to anti-competitive practices and IPR is still at a very nascent stage.

The current state of hybrid jurisdiction clauses in India remains uncertain due to conflicting rulings by the judiciary.

[Shivansh is a student at NALSAR University of Law.] A no-poach agreement is one wherein two or more employers enter into an accord to...

[Milind is a student at National Law University Delhi.] The Competition (Amendment) Bill 2020 (Bill) has received an approval from both...

It is crucial for CCI to play a proactive role when necessary rather than relying solely on other antitrust watchdogs to take action.

The Delhi HC, in the case of ICAI v. CCI, made an attempt to define the scope of jurisdiction of CCI analyzed further in the article.

This piece explores the growth of the gaming industry and argues for the need for active competition oversight in this market.

Per the author, CCI has passed the denial phase of the possibility of algorithmic collusion.

The author examines the settlement and commitment mechanism under the anti-trust regime.

India must have clarity in its information exchange jurisprudence in order to ensure robust enforcement against hub and spoke cartels.

The article aims to contribute to the existing discourse on adapting competition laws to the evolving digital landscape.

Author emphasizes on the need to assess whether big data firms engage in exclusionary acts by essentializing the data.