This article mainly focuses on the topic of exclusive agreements and its intermittent conflict with India’s antitrust regime.

The CCI order in BookMyShow would lead to better antitrust regulation, in an age where market participants rely increasingly on technology.

Authors state that collective dominance is unavoidable in an oligopoly and the same has been explained through application of game theory.

Authors argue that the CCI has adopted an incongruent approach to the factors used in delineating separate aftermarkets.

This article examines CCI's findings upon its market research on India's pharmaceutical industry.

The author analyses the prohibition, in light of the competition law, on app store owners from mandating app developers to use their IAPs.

The author argues that the current stance of the CCI tends to establish a wave of ambiguity in cartel leniency programs in the future.

The authors suggest that the right to repair is beginning to gain recognition as a right that warrants enforcement.

The author makes a case for including sustainability as an important aspect under the already existing competition law framework in India.

This article aims to explore the need for confidentiality ring mechanism in the Indian competition regime.

The author argues that when determining an appreciable adverse effect on competition, we must consider privacy-friendly substitutes.

In this article, the author analyses the basis on which the relationship between privacy matters and competition law is generated.

This article highlights the challenges and the power disputes in competition law in light of the European Super League issue.

The author seeks to analyze if India needs to enact legislation to control digital gatekeeping practices.