This article presents flexible resolution approach as a way forward to curb the menace emanating from inclusion of going concern sale.

This article seeks to evaluate the role of the creditor-in-control model in achieving the objectives of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code.

A court of law that cannot ensure compliance to its orders is a mere courthouse of brick and mortar.

Not only did the NCLT decision disallow the repossession of aircraft by the lessor, but it also projected India as a risky jurisdiction.

The article demonstrates that a foreign arbitral award can be enforced by a financial creditor in India under Section 7 of the IBC.

ARCs have the scope of not just reviving assets but also reviving businesses which would contribute towards a more permanent resolution.

The recognition of consent terms under the IBC represents a significant development in the Indian insolvency regime.

The proposed framework addresses the concerns of small investors and would go a long way in supporting them.

The author argues that the Raman Ispat judgment prudently captures the fallacy in the Rainbow Papers judgment.

Tribunals have denied computation of interest without an express agreement for the same. The authors have argued in favour of computation.

The main issue which revolves around the insolvency of GoFirst is the possession of aircraft.

There is need for a legislative amendment to bring in consistency in the treatment given to security holders under a resolution plan.

The author attempts to analyze the stage that the principle of commercial wisdom of the CoC holds under the Indian insolvency jurisprudence.

This article attempts to highlight the shortcomings of the court’s interpretation of the phrase ‘ordinary course of business’ in Anuj Jain.

Authors analyze the power of CoC to reconsider or review its approval in a case where the successful plan is pending the approval of AA.

This article aims to elucidate the provisions pertaining to reverse CIRP under the IBC.

The author examines the constant tussle between PMLA and IBC.

This article attempts to present a narrower interpretation of the Rainbow Papers judgment.

The author evaluates the judgment in Vidarbha Industries which reverses the position upheld in Innoventive and Bharath Hi-Tecch.

Author proposes a middle ground where promoters and directors are at least allowed to bring proposals under insolvency regime.

This article examines the Supreme Court’s judgement in Vidarbha and examines the dire consequences that it will have on IBC regime.

The author argues that a separate resolution regime for banks is something India desperately needs to properly tackle bank failures.

The article addresses issues relating to flexibility given to COC and resolution professionals in the name of commercial wisdom under IBC.

Authors analyse reasons for introduction of pre-packaged insolvency resolution process and highlight its potential challenges.