The ruling in this case has provided clarity on the intersection of guarantee contracts and insolvency and bankruptcy laws.

In holding that a thumbs-up operated to signify acceptance, the court recognized the evolutionary trajectory of contractual communications.

By harmoniously constructing relevant legislations, a court under a Section 11 will not dwell on the stamping of an agreement.

The principle in pari delicto potior est defendentis is not absolute and is subject to exceptions that have been ignored by Supreme Court.

The article discusses the nature and the enforceability of keepwell agreements.

The article suggests that with the surge in inclusion of indemnity clauses in contracts, caveat venditor has gradually assumed dominance.