This article assesses the rights of secured creditors conditional to filing of security interests prior to, and after the 2016 amendment.

The author foresees several ramifications of the SC judgment in Ebix v. Committee of Creditors of Educomp Solutions.

The author is of the view that a pre-insolvency restructuring process will arrest the flow of cases to the NCLT.

The authors attempt to answer the fundamental questions around haircuts and examine if the same truly cater to the objective of IBC.

While the article celebrates SC’s decision on balance sheet acknowledgment, it highlights its failure to examine Section 18 jurisprudence.

The author examines a recent Delhi HC ruling that attempts to recognize the gap in the law regarding avoidance applications post-resolution.

The authors examine how Ramesh Kymal v Siemens Gamesa Renewable Power aptly depicts Section 10A as being asymmetrical and inadvertent.

The article discusses ipso facto clauses from the standpoint of insolvency and liquidation process.