One Step Forward, Two Steps Back: Analyzing the SEBI’s Inadvertent Restriction on Informed Trading
By classifying unverified market information as UPSI via the amendment, the SEBI contradicts prior jurisprudence on the matter.
top of page
Garima Agrawal
Jan 266 min read
Viability of Flexible Trading Plans under the PIT Regulations: Hit or Miss?
Changes basis American experience might be undesirable without going into the root cause of the unpopularity of TPs.
139
Mayank Jain, Rohan Sood
Aug 17, 20236 min read
Pedestalizing Intention - A Vivid Interpretation of the Insider Trading Regulations
The dichotomy perpetuated by the courts has created a hard barrier for the SEBI Regulations 2015 to achieve their objective.
820
Adarsh Agarwal
Aug 14, 20234 min read
‘Material Non-Public Information’ in SEBI’s Consultation Paper: Implications and Probable Outcomes
The article is an attempt to delve into the concept of material non-public information.
531
Akshat Jain
Jul 19, 20236 min read
Expanding UPSI an Antidote: Reflections on the SEBI Consultation Paper
The article attempts to explore the drawbacks that the amendment relating to UPSI aims to address.
270
Jahnavi Srivastava, Samarth Agarwal
Jun 30, 20235 min read
Demystifying SEBI's Recent Consultation Paper on UPSI: Another One that Bites the Dust?
The author examines the consultation paper dated 18 May 2023 issued by the SEBI.
527
Sharun Salvi, Kiara Dsouza
Mar 8, 20236 min read
Evaluating Balram Garg: Changing the landscape of Insider Trading Laws
This article aims to provide an in-depth analysis of the Supreme Court's ruling in Balram Garg case.
1,533
Shruti Avinash
Oct 8, 20225 min read
Insider Trading and Mens Rea: Indian Jurisprudence, Comparative Developments and the Way Forward
Per the author, it is necessary that the Indian law develops a cohesive standard based on mens rea in the insider trading regime.
1,048
Deesha Reshmi
Oct 3, 20224 min read
The UPSI Period Conundrum – Analyzing SEBI’S Order in The Matter of Reliance Industries
Per the author, in RIL’s case, one may cull out multiple adjudicatory inconsistencies with potential to cause uncertainty.
653
bottom of page